← Aellic Evidenz
Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men
Morton, Oikawa, Wavell, Mazara, McGlory, Quadrilatero, Baechler, Baker, Phillips · 2016 · Journal of Applied Physiology 121(1):129–138
What this work gives Aellic
Confirms Mitchell 2012 in already-trained men over 12 weeks (~30–50 % versus ~75–90 % 1RM, all sets to failure): load is secondary for hypertrophy, proximity to failure is what counts.
Where this sits in the engine
1 declared site: constants and thresholds in the code that point at this entry.
- Training Muscle growth — sets per muscle 1 site
Also in Training
- 2026 The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains
- 2023 Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
- 2022 Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis