← Aellic Evidenz
The relationship between the number of repetitions performed at given intensities is different in endurance and strength trained athletes
Richens, Cleather · 2014 · Biology of Sport 31(2):157–161
What this work gives Aellic
Why a repetition-based estimate degrades at higher rep counts for reasons no formula can fix: at 70 % 1RM endurance runners managed 39.9 ± 17.6 repetitions against weightlifters' 17.9 ± 2.8, and at 80 % 19.8 ± 6.4 against 11.8 ± 2.7 (both p < 0.05); at 90 % the difference vanished. Above roughly 10 repetitions the estimate depends more on training history than on which equation is used. Small sample — 8 athletes per group.
Where this sits in the engine
1 declared site: constants and thresholds in the code that point at this entry.
- Training Workout logging — 1RM estimation 1 site
Also in Training
- 2026 The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains
- 2023 Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
- 2022 Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis