← Aellic Evidenz
Performance of algorithms using wrist temperature for retrospective ovulation day estimate and next menses start day prediction: a prospective cohort study
Wang, Park, Zhang, Jukic, Baird, Coull, Hauser, Mahalingaiah, Zhang · 2025 · Human Reproduction 40(3):469–478
What this work gives Aellic
Retrospective ovulation estimation from wrist temperature: MAE 1.2–1.3 days, 89 % of estimates within ±2 days (PAE2). Carries three constants of the temperature-based ovulation estimate: the signal threshold of +0.2 °C, the confidence band of ±2 days, and the honesty rule that a non-detection is not a finding — only ~80.8 % of cycles reach the threshold at all, and ~19 % produce no usable signal whatsoever. A non-detection therefore explicitly does NOT mean “anovulatory”.
Where this sits in the engine
3 declared sites: constants and thresholds in the code that point at this entry.
- Cycle Phases and cycle-aware baselines 3 sites
Also in Cycle
- 2026 The diagnostic accuracy of wearable digital technology in detecting fertility window and menstrual cycles: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
- 2020 The Effects of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Exercise Performance in Eumenorrheic Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2019 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Within-Person Changes in Cardiac Vagal Activity across the Menstrual Cycle: Implications for Female Health and Future Studies